
The Immutable Kingdom – Part 38
By Scott A. Klaft
(The Development of Denominations continued…)
As James I required uniformity to the Church of England, the Puritans and Catholics were not the only groups to be persecuted for their resistance in British lands. There was also strict oppression forced on the Unitarians, Anabaptists, and the Quakers.
The Quakers
The Quaker movement developed out of the Anabaptist movement; and, around 1650, the attention drawn to the Quakers in England was not the type normally desired. The leaders of this unusual group were George Fox and James Nailer. Nailer was described as a “half-mad fanatic” and single handedly discredited the entire Quaker community by his misdirected zeal. His followers were widely considered public nuisances when they would disturb other group’s worship services by denouncing the preachers as a false prophets and lying witnesses. Nailer was eventually arrested, and the prisons filled with his unquestioning followers. Nailer’s fanaticism was stringently denounced by George Fox, and his followers developed a deeply personal piety. They opposed war, refused to take oaths, and objected to all ministerial orders, but instead relied upon the guidance of the Holy Spirit individually.
The Baptist Church
There were several forces combining to initiate the Baptist Church movement in England. Stemming from the Anabaptist movement on the continent, there was a revival of the teachings of Wycliffe and the Lollards. Two men came out of this background to begin the Baptist Church: John Smyth and Thomas Helwys. Abandoning the Anglican Church and becoming the minister of an independent congregation, Smyth sought sanctuary from Anglican persecution in Holland. While still on the continent, Smyth, Helwys and others began the noble mission to rediscover the New Testament church, rejecting councils and creeds, and accepting the scriptures as their only authority.
Eventually Smyth came to the conclusion that baptism was only for the believer and proceeded to “baptize” himself by pouring; Helwys and the rest of the congregation followed form. Associated at first with the Mennonites of Amsterdam, who were mainly Armenian in philosophy, Smyth rethought and rejected his Calvinistic teaching that Children were born in sin, and therefore rejected infant baptism. Helwys agreed in this, but broke with Smyth over church organization, teaching a modified episcopacy. In this state of division, Smyth died and Helwys returned to England in 1611, setting up what is typically regarded as the first Baptist Church on British soil. By 1644, their number had increased to fifty congregations, but the Particular Baptists (who were Calvinistic) wanted to separate from the General Baptists who organized their own distinct association.
Their mode of “baptism” (sprinkling or pouring) was eventually replaced by immersion only after working through some contention over who could baptize whom, seeing that none had yet been immersed. The Particular Baptists progressed under a loose association, while the General Baptists organized their first general assembly in London in 1654. The Baptist Church was irreconcilably divided in theology between the Calvinistic and Armenian positions from the start.
Wesleyans and the Methodists
The established Church of England employed very few of the principles of the Reformation movement, remaining a system of outward ceremony and cold formalism. While this caused many groups to part ways to concentrate on their own form of the Protestant movement, there was another active movement happening within the Church of England itself. Unsatisfied by the ritualistic practices of the clergy, certain ones began to seek to restore the piety and spiritual zeal they thought belonged with true Christianity. The personalities of John and Charles Wesley and George Whitfield gave great motion to this movement.
(To Be Continued Next Week)
Posted by sklaft 
Posted by sklaft
Posted by sklaft 