The Falling Away (continued)
As the apostle Paul went everywhere establishing the churches of Christ (cf. Romans 16:16), he also wrote letters to instruct them in what they needed to know and what to avoid (cf. Ephesians 3:1-4). Although there were varying themes in each of his letters (also known as “epistles”), Paul never failed to leave a warning against those who would try to subvert the faith of the members of the church.
One unmistakable example was when he wrote the second letter to the church at Thessalonica (see 2Thessalonians 2:1-12). Someone had confused them about the return of Jesus, saying that it already had come to pass. Paul’s sentiment was, “not so”. He literally said Jesus would not return until there came a “…falling away…”, and that there would be someone who exalts himself above God and would lead this falling away by the “…working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders…” People would believe in him because “…they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.” In the guise of true religion, therefore, they would have a “…strong delusion, that they should believe a lie…” Paul foretold the means by which the “falling away” from the true pattern would be accomplished.
As Paul became unable to attend to the needs of all the churches, he saw fit to send his trustworthy fellow-workers to help them. In Ephesus, Timothy received a letter of instruction as to how the church is to conduct its daily duties (cf. 1Timothy 3:15). Paul then tells the younger preacher of the future as it was revealed by the Holy Spirit (cf. 1Timothy 4:1-3), explicitly saying that some would teach things in the near future that would be lies, hypocrisy, doctrines of devils, and would constitute a departure from the faith. Some of these things are specifically mentioned, such as “Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats…” Not only did Paul know the specifics of the departure, but also the church, its elders and preachers should have known. They were warned.
Relatively speaking, it was not long before the words of Jesus and Paul (et. al.) concerning the apostasy began to be fulfilled. In fact, while Paul was writing, he said, “…the mystery of iniquity doth already work…” (2Thessalonians 2:7). The “…man of sin… the son of perdition” was already on his way into his own power. Even while some of the apostles were still alive, certain men were so bold as to try to take over whole congregations. In the third epistle from the pen of John, we discover someone named “Diotrephes” who was “…prating against us with malicious words… neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth them out of the church” (3John 9-11).
This trend would continue, increase, and dominate the church over a shockingly short period of time. By the year 150 A.D., there came to be an unscriptural distinction between the terms “presbyter” and “bishop”, exalting one man above all others within the eldership. A prominent man by the name of Ignatius of Antioch was an advocate of this departure. Inevitably, there was an expansion of the power wielded by the “bishop”, first over the individual congregation, and soon, over several congregations. As this departure developed, occasionally there would be one to claim the title of “universal bishop”, but these were generally ignored. Between 150 A.D. and 311 A.D., however, there was a strong movement toward the development of a hierarchy after the pattern of the Jewish Levitical-priesthood. The “bishop” was akin to the High priest, the “presbyters” were like the priests, and the “deacons” became analogous to the Levites of the Old Testament. In fairness, it should be said that their motives were not always necessarily sinister.
Ironically, these departures from the New Testament structure of the church were often inaugurated in order to prevent doctrinal heresies from entering in among the membership. One departure as a protective tactic against another, however, is in no way justified. It would only be the beginning of a terrible and incremental digression.
(To be continued next week)

Posted by sklaft 
Posted by sklaft